Useful Tips

How to get a copy of the court decision through the State Services


According to the procedural legislation in courts of general jurisdiction, the keeping of court records in criminal, civil and administrative cases is mandatory (Article 259 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, Article 228 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, Article 204 of the CAS of the Russian Federation).

So, in civil disputes, according to Art. 228, 230 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of November 14, 2002 N 138-ФЗ (as amended on July 29, 2017, as amended and supplemented, entered into force on 08/10/2017), hereinafter the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, during each court session first instance, as well as when committing out of court each individual procedural action, a protocol is drawn up. The minutes shall be drawn up at the court session or upon the commission of a separate procedural action outside the session by the secretary of the court session. The minutes are drawn up in writing. To ensure the completeness of the compilation of the protocol, the court may use shorthand, audio recording means and other technical means.

According to Art. 231 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, persons participating in the case, their representatives have the right to familiarize themselves with the protocol and, within five days from the date of its signing, to submit written comments on the protocol indicating the inaccuracies and (or) its incompleteness.

In accordance with the second paragraph of clause 7.12 “Instructions for judicial proceedings in a district court” (hereinafter the Instruction), which was approved by order of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated April 29, 2003 No. 36 (as amended on 01/09/2018) “On approval of the Instructions on judicial clerical work in a district court ”(as amended and supplemented, entered into force on 06/01/2018), which governs the processing of cases after their consideration, it is indicated that the parties to administrative and criminal cases may ask the court to make a copy of the record of the court session but for the participants anskih cases of this law in this provision is not provided. And in clause 12.6 of the Instructions, it is explained that a copy of the protocol is made at the written request of the participant in the trial and at its expense, the copies taken from the materials of the case file taken at its own expense are not certified by the court.

According to the position of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, voiced during the consideration of case No. AKPI17-589 of 10.10.17, the decision to make a copy of the minutes of the meeting in a civil case, in connection with a statement from the participant in the process, is made at the discretion of the chairman of the district court. At the meeting, it was noted that the Code of Civil Procedure (Code of Civil Procedure), unlike the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code of Criminal Procedure) and the Code of Administrative Procedure, does not directly indicate that the participant in the proceedings has the right to receive a copy of the protocol made at his expense.

The judge also reminded the participants in the proceedings that in 2012 the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in a decision on the case of contesting the same instruction on clerical work indicated the need to apply article 259 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on making copies of the protocol for the parties to similar relations in civil proceedings by analogy with law and law. In this regard, the judge of the RF Armed Forces appealed to the Judicial Department through his representatives with a request to explain to the heads of district courts the procedure for providing copies of the minutes of court hearings in civil cases so that citizens would not encounter problems in obtaining the relevant documents. In conclusion, the judge noted that after the adoption of the law on amendments to the procedural codes, Article 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation would be supplemented by the provision on the right of persons participating in the case to receive a copy of the court record made by the court at the expense of the applicant.

Thus, it is possible to obtain a copy of the minutes of the court session at the written request of the participant in the trial, by removing the copy of the applicant without the court participating in the manufacturing costs. These costs are borne by the applicant (purchase of paper, use of their copy equipment, etc.).

You can familiarize yourself with samples of statements of claim and documents you need, background information here: Home page.

When using the site materials reference to the source is required »Copyright iskoved. com © 2018

Who is entitled to request

According to the current legislation, a request for written confirmation of the outcome of the trial can only be made by the participants in the case or by the state authorities that are directly related to the execution of the verdict.

It is important to know! Persons participating in the process are entitled to demand that they provide as many copies of the document as is necessary to fulfill the will of the court.

In addition to the fact that each party to the case must be provided with a copy of the paper, the plaintiff has the right to personally contact the Federal Bailiff Service so that the verdict is enforced (if it is not executed voluntarily). In such a situation, you will need to write a statement with a copy of the judge’s decision and transfer the documents to the civil service.

State institutions, which in accordance with the accepted result of the case must perform certain actions, must also receive written evidence that they are doing everything according to the law. In this case, the credentials will be confirmed by a copy of the court verdict with the stamp of the court that issued it.

How to get

The plaintiff and defendant receive their copies of the result of the case at the end of the process. If these persons for objective reasons could not attend the meeting, then the document can be received by their representatives against receipt. In the absence of a trustee, the decision is sent by post with declared value.

Attention! The decision by the judge in most cases means the end of the dispute, and the document, which is the justification for the decision, cannot be changed unless an appeal is filed in the case.

It is possible to request additional copies by submitting a standard application. It must indicate a good reason for its submission. For example, list the institutions where you want to submit the document.

If the participants in the procedure need to receive the paper after some time, a written request should be made to the judicial office. The application is submitted in one of the following ways:

  • by personal appeal,
  • via Russian Post.

The application must indicate the number of the case, the personal data of each of the parties and the person under whose jurisdiction the process was. It is also required to enter a link to legislative acts: part 1 of article 123 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, part 1 of article 10 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, Art. 14 and 18 of the Federal Law "On providing access to information on the activities of courts in the Russian Federation." In addition, it is very important to indicate a copy of which decision sheet is required, as the document contains several acts.

Information: The result of the appeal or cassation court is requested by filing an application with the office of the local judicial authority, which was the first institution where the complaint was examined.

Citizens often have a question - how to get a copy of a court decision through State services. The answer is below.

Receiving through the Portal of State Services

The court is considered a government agency that is not represented on a single portal. Most proceedings are carried out only with the personal filing of an application (lawsuit). This is due to the specific conduct of legal proceedings. That is, a court decision through the State Services is not provided. However, it is possible to contact the courts through the Internet.

The user's personal account provides the ability to log in to many web resources of government agencies. One of them is the Arbitration Court. A separate Internet address is allocated for this structure - My Arbiter If the user has an account on the State Services, then additional authorization on the Arbitration service is not required.

Step-by-step algorithm

The procedure is carried out, according to information on a single portal. In order to file an application with the Arbitration Court through the State Services, you must adhere to the following instructions:

  1. Go to the online service and select the type of application or complaint you need.
  2. Further, the system will offer to pass authorization using an account on the portal of public services. It is required to click on the button "Public services".
  3. After that, the user will be redirected to a single portal, where you will need to log in to your account by entering the username and password.
  4. Next, the service will prompt you to transfer account data. If the user already has a profile on the My Arbiter website, then you must specify your username and password in order to transfer the information. You can also simply close this notification.
  5. Select the type of appeal and click on the “Next” button.
  6. Indicate information about the plaintiff or several plaintiffs and click "Next".
  7. After that, you will need to enter information about the applicant, select the judicial authority, where you need to send an application.
  8. It is imperative to attach electronic versions of the necessary documents in order to support the statement with facts.
  9. Submit a request for consideration.

The application is sent to the specified judicial authority and is registered there. The process of its consideration and processing is displayed in the personal account of the registered person on the service.

Important! If, for any reason, the judicial authority does not issue a copy of the verdict, the applicant has the full right to file a complaint in the name of the president of the court.

Thus, it is directly impossible to obtain a copy of the court decision through the State Services - for this it is necessary to use the services of another web resource.

Service experience

The first application was submitted on January 10, 2017; the last on June 26, 2017. Total has been filed 31 statement and 1 administrative action. Only 1 application for the return of the original documents was granted to me.

For all the rest "Technical failure" . True three statements are registered but court officials cannot find these statements.

  • Download this image "data-fresco-caption ="
    Download this image "target =" _ blank "data-thumb =" / cache / jw_sigpro / jwsigpro_cache_ae9ddb1b7e_dostupest.jpg "data-fancybox =" galleryae9ddb1b7e ">Call History Call History
  • Download this image "data-fresco-caption ="
    Download this image "target =" _ blank "data-thumb =" / cache / jw_sigpro / jwsigpro_cache_ae9ddb1b7e_podacha.jpg "data-fancybox =" galleryae9ddb1b7e ">Call History Call History

I tried to correspond, they answer all nonsense. I am currently waiting for a decision on the adoption of an administrative claim.

The lawsuit was accepted and considered, filed an appeal, which was also accepted.

  • Download this image "data-fresco-caption ="
    Download this image "target =" _ blank "data-thumb =" / cache / jw_sigpro / jwsigpro_cache_42fa6d44e2_delo22.jpg "data-fancybox =" gallery42fa6d44e2 ">Access to business Access to business
  • Download this image "data-fresco-caption ="
    Download this image "target =" _ blank "data-thumb =" / cache / jw_sigpro / jwsigpro_cache_42fa6d44e2_dostupkdelu.jpg "data-fancybox =" gallery42fa6d44e2 ">Access to business Access to business

Three years later, the system runs on solid 3, but 100% cannot be trusted. Applications may be lost or rejected after a week.